Compare CMT and A Light Rail System for Cost and CO2 Impact


Compare Bus and Rail


CMT costs less per mile, has more miles of route and attracts more new riders.
Costs less per mile since all miles are on roads that are shared with auto traffic.
Queue jumpers, signal contral and HOT lanes permit the CMT express bus to travel faster than a conventional bus.
The more extensive CMT express network, coupled with 150 circulator routes
that run every ten minutes will connect more homes to more jobs and attract more riders.
bar charts of two systems


More riders riding farther will displace more car miles.

CMT : 40,000 riders x 24 miles per day = 1.2 riders per car mile x 800,000 car miles
Liht Rail : 6000 riders x 16 miles per day = 1.2 riders per car mile x 80,000 car miles
The CMT buses and vans might not be as clean as the train.
They might avoid less CO2 per 100 passenger miles.
But because the reduction in car miles is much greater with CMT,
 the CO2 reduction will also be much greater.
Compare bar charts B

CMT saves the riding public more money.
Each rider saves $4000 a year by not having to own a car or pay for gas.
CMT : 40,000 new riders X $4000 = $ 160 million per year
Light Rail : 6000 new riders X $4000 = $ 24 million per year
Low income workers can use saved cash to save for retirement or pay for health insurance.
Bar charts C

Return